tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post6633598439334130169..comments2010-12-13T13:07:18.873-08:00MyPerfumeLifehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17468093321436346274noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-29662455035913388702010-12-13T13:07:18.873-08:002010-12-13T13:07:18.873-08:00I couldn&#39;t agree more! Grazia and other magazines should sit up and listen. What&#39;s the point of an article that doesn&#39;t actually say anything!Thoosa Running Girlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10076969305553633073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-50575180170338887242010-12-09T06:39:22.322-08:002010-12-09T06:39:22.322-08:00Go Jess!!Bellatrixhttp://be-bellatrix.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-847908347601729622010-12-08T14:40:23.852-08:002010-12-08T14:40:23.852-08:00Not just the whole &#39;confusing&#39; side of the article, but then they go and say &quot;Chloé Love, Chloé - luxe neroli&quot;<br />what? There&#39;s barely a HINT of neroli. Orange blossom (different to neroli, even if though it is the same flower) is listed as a note in some sources, but it&#39;s barely prominent. If anything, Iris or Heliotrope is what would be &#39;luxe&#39; in that scent. It&#39;s all about powder.<br /><br />I know scent is subjective (we all smell the same stuff, just interpret differently) but it just smacks of lazy journalism or someone wanting to sound like they know what they are talking about. I always get annoyed seeing perfume bundled in with &#39;beauty&#39; or &#39;grooming&#39; in magazines, though.Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13367542314632915734noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-3697188587464267262010-12-08T05:40:30.466-08:002010-12-08T05:40:30.466-08:00Thanks for all being so supportive. I was a bit nervous about writing this - but Grazia have ignored it - even though I tweeted them directly too. Ho hum.MyPerfumeLifehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17468093321436346274noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-87897940356926864902010-12-07T18:51:58.891-08:002010-12-07T18:51:58.891-08:00Excellent point and one which I hadn&#39;t thought of really in so much detail. It bears repeating: Being specific about individual de facto differences while experiencing and writing about perfume.Buy Discount Perfumeshttp://www.highstreetperfumes.com.aunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-54337856690174610172010-12-07T18:28:45.779-08:002010-12-07T18:28:45.779-08:00One of my thoughts was, Diptyque Eau Duelle on the &quot;more&quot; list? I don&#39;t think so. I love it, but it&#39;s soft and cozy, and not to be put in the same category as no. 5.Carrie Meredithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10087942243335319004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-54383466153874255942010-12-07T11:53:17.535-08:002010-12-07T11:53:17.535-08:00I read that article!! What a load of cobblers! lol Needless to say I haven&#39;t acted on any of their &#39;advise&#39;!!<br />xxxMs. Wedgiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09414142809610934619noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-24184313942798181422010-12-07T06:29:46.434-08:002010-12-07T06:29:46.434-08:00love it - thanks Jess!Bloody Fridahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06394558427981331885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-62735720599420972582010-12-07T06:03:43.593-08:002010-12-07T06:03:43.593-08:00Good points! <br />I have to say I totally agree with you. <br /><br />Fee xAbout Makeup Savvyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680012311873427885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3732825245307953350.post-20641772318379656162010-12-07T05:42:37.585-08:002010-12-07T05:42:37.585-08:00Bravo!<br />But to educate readers, the journalist must be educated first. Maybe that is where the problem lies?olfactoriastravels.comhttp://olfactoriastravels.com/noreply@blogger.com